| |
Home is Where the Heorot is:
Interpreting Beowulf's Mead-Hall in Terms of Tolkien's Balance
by Victor Chica
(Portland Community College)
Beowulf's "hall of halls," Heorot, is prominent in the first half of the poem and is fundamental to its structure. Significant because it is 'literally' a structure that provides safety and community for the Danes; Heorot is also a metaphoric structure that is rich with meaning and possibilities for interpretation. A close reading of the poem reveals that Heorot is, in addition to being essential to the story's action, the central element in concurrent cultural and spiritual metaphors. Moreover, its interpretation can be neatly framed in terms of J.R.R. Tolkien's concept of "balance."
Tolkien, in his seminal 1936 essay "The Monsters and the Critics," argues that we must dismiss the conception of Beowulf as a steadily-advancing narrative poem.
"It is essentially a balance, an opposition of ends and beginnings. In its simplest terms it is a contrasted description of two moments in a great life, rising and setting; an elaboration of the ancient and intensely moving contrast between youth and age, first achievement and final death." (28)
This balance of which Tolkien speaks is found throughout the poem and, indeed, throughout many interpretations of its symbolism. Applying this concept to Heorot, we see that each of the metaphors embodied by the hall is a juxtaposition of competing ideas that contrast opposing ways of life and states of being. We see Tolkien's balance at work in Heorot from the outset. In the poet's introduction of the hall, he weaves an account of its ultimate destruction into his description of its creation:
"...he handed down orders
for men to work on a great mead-hall
meant to be a wonder of the world forever...
[See Notes]
...The hall towered,
its gables wide and high and awaiting
a barbarous burning.(68-85)
We are given a description of the hall in its august early splendor intertwined with one of its ignominious ultimate death. This balance, here a tension between the opposing ideas of creation and destruction, is also evident in the relationship between the world inside Heorot to that outside of it.
As John Halverson has noted, the poet uses language that portrays Heorot as a "beacon of civilization" (99), and the contrast between the hall and the hostile world outside it can be interpreted as a struggle between order and chaos. The poet rarely describes nature, but the few times he does, it is usually in reference to the Grendel monster or its mother: "Then a powerful demon, a prowler in the dark, / nursed a hard grievance" (86-87). He continues, describing dark, desolate wetlands inhabited by "monsters and elves and specters" (112). This striking contrast between the civilized world of the inside and the chaotic one of the outside is one that forms the basis for the cultural and spiritual metaphors in the mead-hall.
Heorot's significance to the poem is twofold: literally, as a structure in the action of the poem, and metaphorically, as a symbolic structure. As the former, the hall acts as the center of heroic society, both practically and emotionally. It provides warmth, sustenance, and a place for revelry for the Danes. It is where celebrations are held and treasure is distributed as when Beowulf and his war-band arrive, after Grendel is defeated. The poet describes the hall as a harmonious place filled with the warmth of companionship: "inside Heorot / there was nothing but friendship" (1017-1018). It is a safe haven from the hazards of the dangerous world outside. In this literal sense, the hall serves as the predominant cultural and social institution in the Danish kingdom. It is in Heorot that the heroic values of Germanic society are displayed in full, and it is these values that form the basis of the story's cultural metaphor and the mead-hall's place in it.
As part of a cultural metaphor, Heorot, the "greatest house / in the world" (145-146), is a symbol of human civilization on earth, with the monsters' attacks representing the occasional intrusion of the surrounding wilderness. More specifically, however, the mead-hall symbolizes the values of the Germanic heroic society. In heroic culture, the most important relationship is that between a lord and his comitatus, his band of warriors; the mead-hall is where that relationship is formed and maintained. It is in the mead-hall that warriors declare loyalty to their lords, and where Beowulf makes his "formal boast" (639) to defeat Grendel and protect Hrothgar and his people, vowing, "I shall fulfill that purpose, prove myself with a proud deed / or meet my death here in the mead-hall" (636-638). It is also in the mead-hall that "ring-givers" reward warriors for their service. Hrothgar does this in Heorot when, after Grendel is defeated, he presents Beowulf with "a gold standard as a victory gift, / an embroidered banner; also breast-mail / and a helmet; and a sword carried high" (1020-1022). These gifts represent, not just payment for services rendered, but honors, bestowed upon warriors who abide by the Germanic heroic code. Thus as a metaphoric structure, the mead-hall affirms the values of that code.
In terms of balance, this cultural metaphor presents the monsters, particularly Grendel, as a contrast to the values of the heroic code, which is fundamentally based on values of generosity and reciprocation of treasure, service, and affection. Members of the comitatus serve their lord, who in turn rewards them with treasure; amongst themselves, warriors cultivate bonds of fellowship and, with a good king, bonds of paternal affection. The whole system breaks down, however, without these two elements. We see this represented in the description of Grendel's displeasure with the revelry in the mead-hall: "It harrowed him to hear the din of the loud banquet every day in the hall" (87-89). It vexes Grendel that others are not alone, as he is. The monster's solitude makes him the antithesis of what the heroic code stands for. Grendel neither gives to nor receives from anyone, nor is he responsible to anyone. This is what drives him to attack Heorot. His attack, then, represents a clash of opposing values, presenting a balance of the light and dark sides of Germanic heroic culture.
Even more so than its cultural allegory, Beowulf's spiritual allegory makes much use of Heorot as a symbol. It is worth noting that the word Heorot, though it literally translates to hart or stag, closely resembles heorte the word for heart, soul, or spirit. This is fitting, even if only coincidental, because of what Heorot symbolizes in the spiritual metaphor. Here, the mead-hall represents the human soul beset by evil, and the poem's messianic language not to mention its Christian author may indicate that Heorot is meant to symbolize humanity under siege by sin and in need of a redeeming savior.
The contrast between the ordered, moral, and safe Heorot with the disordered, amoral, and dangerous world outside it creates a dichotomy between the soul in its "natural" state and in a "state of grace," as the poet might say. This "state of grace" is brought about through the work of Beowulf, who delivers the Danes from evil. To be sure, hero-worship is a fundamental part of the Germanic heroic tradition, but the infusion of religion and moralistic language edges this element of the story toward the messiah-worship of Christianity. This explicitly religious form of hero-worship begins with King Hrothgar's reception of Beowulf:
"Now Holy God
has, in His goodness, guided him here
...to defend us from Grendel." (381-383)
Beowulf is greeted just as warmly by Hrothgar's wife, who thanks God for sending "a deliverer she could believe in...to ease their afflictions" (626-628). This hints at a degree of parallelism between the birth of Jesus and that of Beowulf, something the poet was surely aware of. This parallel is made explicit when Hrothgar proclaims that Beowulf's mother "can say / that in her labor the Lord of Ages / bestowed a grace on her" (944-945). Combined with the language used to recount the "cleansing" of Heorot, the similarities between these two saviors point to the underlying moral metaphor of the poem. Beowulf, after all, has the "privilege of purifying Heorot" (emphasis added) (431) and ridding it of Grendel, who is the "captain of evil" (749). The spiritual metaphor, then, presents a conflict between the soul in its sinful state of nature that is, sullied by the attack of Grendel, or sin and the soul in a state of grace. It falls on Beowulf, presented as a savior, to redeem the heorte, cleanse the mead-hall of evil, and restore it to a state of grace.
Far from being just part of the scenery, Heorot is a richly symbolic element of Beowulf and is critical to the interpretation of the text. The language used in relation to the symbol of the hall hints at underlying cultural and spiritual metaphors at work beneath the story of Beowulf and Grendel. Moreover, it reflects the worldview, assumptions, and intentions of the Beowulf-poet, and analysis of Heorot can contribute greatly to the ongoing study of these facets of the poem.
Works Consulted
Beowulf: A New Verse Translation.Trans. Seamus Heaney. 1st ed.New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2000.
Bjork, Robert E., and John D. Niles.A Beowulf Handbook. Lincoln University of Nebraska Press, 1997.
Fry, Donald K., ed.The Beowulf Poet: A Collection of Critical Essays. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1968.
Halverson, John."The World of Beowulf."ELH 36:4 (1969): 593-608.Rpt. in Readings on Beowulf. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 1998.99-106.
Nicholson, Lewis E., ed.An Anthology of Beowulf Criticism. Notre Dame: U of Notre Dame P, 1963.
Orchard, Andy.A Critical Companion to Beowulf. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2003.
Thompson, Stephen P., ed. Readings on Beowulf. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 1998.
Tolkien, J.R.R. "Beowulf: The Monsters and the Critics." Proceedings of the British Academy 22 (1936): 245-95.Rpt. in The Monsters and the Critics and Other Essays. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1984.5-48.
Top of page.
|
|